In my last post I argued that, for both Christians and non-Christians, we neither have—nor can have—certainty about the Bible’s claims nor about the validity of its claims. In place of certainty we have interpretation.
Before rushing into a technical discussion about interpretation, however, it is important to situate such a discussion within its practical, real-life context. Why? Because this seemingly dry topic is important—important enough even to get “picky” about what interpretation is and how to do it—for a very practical and personal reason: people matter.
Typically we think of interpretation as focusing on ideas: techniques to help us know things better. Certainly ideas are important and interpretation both requires that we think about ideas and helps us better to understand them.
But ideas are not the point. People are the point.
So this discussion of interpretation was actually borne from my earlier challenge that absolute / ultimate truth (or Truth) is only meaningful if it is true “for me.” This challenge itself resulted from my claim that love and truth are essential to human existence, where I noted that the greatest truth-for-me is to be deeply loved by one who knows me truly, and whom I deeply love in return.
Thus where the desire to love and be loved is a central human aspiration, the pursuit of truth is integral to meaningful, human existence. We may take this a step further and note that ours is not only a desire to be loved, but to be loved in and as who we are. In other words, it is a desire not to be treated as an object but known profoundly—and being so known, to be cherished—as the self that we are.
Reframed, we desire to be known truly and loved profoundly by one / those whom we likewise know genuinely and love deeply.
So truth is integral to love in several ways. First, I want the knowledge that others have about me to be true, so that their love is really for me: they don’t idolize me for isolated qualities nor value me mistakenly (as someone or something that I am not). Rather they know my authentic self, and in so knowing me they love me.
Second, in order for another to know me truly I must know and understand myself—as Socrates would say, I must know who I truly am.
Third, I likewise want to know my beloved truly. So my beloved’s identity (as someone who claims to respect, be loyal to, and love me) must not be based on incomplete or false information (as an unconfessed affair, or a hidden need to marry in order to retain citizenship / have financial security, etc.)
Thus my interest in interpretation is neither to dethrone notions of ultimate t/Truth nor merely to supplant one view with another. Rather, interpretation (of texts, experiences, situations, etc.) is a skill that matters because it allows us to gain some of our most meaningful connection to ourselves, to other people, and to evaluate how and how authentically they connect with us.
My point, then, is that truth remains connected with love, through and through. And just as truth-seeking and truth-finding are integral to loving and being loved, so accurately assessing truth claims and truth values by way of interpretation is among the most meaningful of tasks.
In subsequent posts I reframe interpretation. It is not an all-or-nothing hedge against relativism but is a skill that all possess and that can be improved with practice and knowledge.
In the end, interpretation helps keep us honest: it insists that we remain amongst the ambiguities and tensions inherent to our finite situation. But it also gives gifts: we can have strong confidence in knowing (and so understanding) some things, even in knowing the that we love and, perhaps, are loved.
“But ideas are not the point. People are the point.”
One word.
Booyah!
That is a pretty profound statement and I am sure a lot of people are aware of this truth… yet, there continues to be a focus on ideas, ideology and theology in Christianity. With the big JC as my inspiration for living a life based in truth and love, I can honestly say he would totally have your back on that one.
From my understanding, Jesus was a man who did just that… loved people. Ideas were not really his thing. He was had his two feet firmly planted in relationship and connection. He loved everyone and anyone… as deeply and fiercely as he could and I admire him for it… and I strive to be like him as a result.
The other piece to your sharing above that resonated with me so very deeply was this:
“In other words, it is a desire not to be treated as an object but known profoundly—and being so known, to be cherished—as the self that we are.”
Two words.
Hot. Damn.
This reminds me of a deep awareness I experienced a while back with a mentor… I became painfully aware of the deep longing I have to be seen… by another… which is much the same as being known.
I appreciated the way you described your own heartfelt desire to have another experience your truth, to see you as you are, to love you as you are and then, for you to be able to offer the same experience to another… most desirably to your beloved. I also noticed how you affirmed the importance of knowing yourself before being able to truly be known by another. That has been my experience as well.
And then…
“Rather, interpretation (of texts, experiences, situations, etc.) is a skill that matters because it allows us to gain some of our most meaningful connection to ourselves, to other people, and to evaluate how and how authentically they connect with us.”
Three words.
Yes. Yes. and Yes.
(okay, I guess that’s four words)
For me, interpretation of texts, experiences, situations, insights and more is indeed a crucial piece to my self discovery. I learn a great deal while moving through the different ways the above opportunities affect me, validate me, resonate with me or do none of these or even do the opposite. Sharing my discoveries with another adds clarification and can promote connection which may or may not spark new ideas or discoveries as a result. It’s one big happy interpretation party that results in our moving ever closer to the concept of authentic self based in truth, love and connection. Sounds good to me.
Hi Mama,
I’m glad to see how much you resonate with this emphasis. I often feel that, in practical terms, this is the most problematic Christian orientation that I encounter.
Specifically, evangelical Christianity’s biggest downfall occurs when truth is set in a fixed and rigid hierarchy over love: such Christians are then guilty of valuing (biblical) truth over love (of neighbour). And from there, everything goes awry.
My hunch is that, in most churches and indeed for most people, the “hard work” of knowing themselves (think Socrates)–being in the presence of their feelings (particularly their fear that their beliefs may be either wrong, insufficient, or simply unimportant), and thinking through the issues related to their belief and the views / information in the world around them.
This indeed is HARD work. Yet it is not only necessary but also uplifting insofar as this process is also part and parcel of both becoming as self and relating to God. And to the extent that both of these relationships (with myself and with God) are solidified and flourish, they cross-pollinate and so inform & invigorate my relationships with others (loving my neighbour as myself) and my world (in being a steward of God’s creation).
And this, in turn, can bring peace and joy.
Pingback: Understanding the Bible: interpretation for everyone - Another Christian OptionAnother Christian Option