How to “waste your time” with the Bible


“If it’s not real, I don’t waste my time reading it.”

On occasion I have heard this from a senior citizen.  But from an 8 year old?  My first response was sadness at the wonderful worlds that this child will never visit, and the fantastic places that will remain unknown as so many stories—”timewasters”—don’t make the cut.

Previously, I debunked the idea that stories threaten certainty by showing how such certainty (and the security that accompanies it) are pathological desires for an absolute or ultimate perspective that only God can have.

But what about the related idea that reality is more important than what is imaginary, particularly for Christians?

Interestingly, this view comes from the 8 year old’s church-going parents.  And for Christians—people whose beliefs are deeply informed by a book replete with stories—such a view amounts to believing that biblical narratives are truly (and only) historical.  Historical writing, or historiography, is good; fictional writing is not.

But does this view mesh with the Bible itself?

In a word, No.  The form and content of the Gospels resists such a view.  For when read in this light, they are eminently contradictory.  Matthew portrays that this happened before that; Mark portrays the opposite.  Luke indicates that Jesus was X days between his arrest and resurrection; John indicates Y days.  The list goes on.

On the “historical reality” view one of the Gospels may be true, but not the others.  Or maybe we need to weave them all together somehow.  Or . . .  On such a view the gospel writers are at very least confused (and not worth our attention), if not liars.

No, weighing the gospel (or biblical) narratives according to such a view is misrepresentative because this view itself is false.  Two points demonstrate this.

First, the gospels are ancient documents written according to first century conventions and standards of historiography, not according to our own.  For example, the gospels are clearly not concerned to present historical reality as “what really happened,” because the same events in Jesus’ life could not possibly have happened in two different ways.

Instead, the Gospels are fictionalized history: texts based on actual, historical events yet artistically composed with a goal of cultivating belief in Jesus as the son of God.  Expressed differently, it does not so much matter that Jesus healed this person in this way after having healed that person in that way (and before healing this third person).  What matters is that Jesus truly healed.  And most significantly, I will later argue that (in ways yet to be specified) Jesus heals now, and can heal even us.

Second, the “reality trumps all” view undermines the most crucial of biblical claims: that God loves you and deeply desires relationship with you.  On the historical reality view these are simply facts to be accepted: take it or leave it.  And facts are assessed using reason (to determine whether these claims make sense to us) and responded to with the will (to make ourselves act upon them).

But Christian faith is not foremost an act of the will, but a disposition of the heart.  Nor does belief primarily originate with reason.  This is reflected in the very nature of the Bible’s key claims: they are not  dead facts but living dispositions of an entity who is love.

And just as love invites, woos, and inspires so if God’s love is real it cannot be expressed by (or constrained within) historical reality alone.  It far bigger (and more real!) than that.  As historiography, the Bible has the power artfully to express what happened in the past, while as fiction it has the power to transport the events of the past into our own lives by drawing us into its unique world.  Thus the Bible not only recounts what is real but champions what is possible: these claims become living possibilities waiting to be actualized.

And how are they actualized?  It begins with human imagination.

3 thoughts on “How to “waste your time” with the Bible

    • Hi Mama,

      Thanks so much for your encouragement, and I’m glad that my emphasis on love is resonating with you. Love is both crucial in my life and as a key component (along with truth) in my experience of God.

      Indeed, it is my effort to communicate my love of being loved and known by God that has led to me explore such notions as narrative, historiography, and the imagination.

      On the one hand, this is because I cannot take someone inside of me to feel what I feel or take them back in time to stand in my shoes (so as to experience what I experienced). On the other hand, these notions are important because I do not want merely to revel in my feelings and experiences (or else I would be writing poetry, not philosophy/theology).

      Instead, I want to offer to others the possibilities that were offered to me: the possibility that God–or an encounter with God–could be genuine, and how this may be so.

      Why is this important? Because in encountering God I have fallen in love: my heart is captured and is now more at home than ever it was when it remained with me. And I wish this love to continue, to abound. I wish to be be in and near my beloved and my beloved’s love for me. I wish always, always to find myself acquainted with and collaborating on its projects, endeavouring for its goals, seeking its best and highest.

  1. Sounds absolutely beautiful… and somewhat recent, this experience of “falling”… What a huge and lovely gift from God. He’s pretty awesome that way. So happy for you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *